The “Vineyard Canopy Management” series of University of Georgia Cooperative Extension publications reviews each canopy management practice individually. Each circular advises how to effectively implement each canopy management practice and why it is important to do so. The practices collectively known as “canopy management” aim to maximize canopy leaf exposure and efficiency, maintain crop quantity and quality, decrease disease incidence and severity, and improve vineyard health and sustainability. Although labor- intensive, canopy management is not optional if the goal is annual production of high quality grapes and wines.
Shoot thinning is the first seasonal canopy management practice. Shoot thinning is practiced in wine grape vineyards, but not in muscadine vineyards. Failure to shoot thin results in a highly congested canopy characterized by reduced air flow, high humidity, and extended damp periods. Muscadines can generally tolerate such conditions without adverse effects. Wine grapes grown in crowded fruit zones, however, will experienceexcessive disease incidence and severity–especially in the humid Southeastern U.S. Shoot thinning is thus a necessary canopy management practice in wine grape vineyards in Georgia and other Southeastern states.
Why to thin shoots
Dormant pruning is the first step in crop regulation (Hickey and Hatch 2018). Please refer to UGA Extension Bulletin 1505, “Dormant Spur and Cane Pruning Bunch Grapevines,” if clarification is needed on vine anatomy. Clusters are borne on shoots that emerge from the count buds retained during pruning. Shoot thinning is thus the second opportunity to regulate crop yield. Shoot thinning is particularly important when using a combination of cordon/spur training. Basal buds are left at the base of retained spurs. Less fruitful, or unfruitful, shoots will emerge from the basal and latent buds located at the junction of the spur and cordon, and the net effect is often excessive shoot density without a tandem increase in crop. Relative to spur pruning, cane pruning limits the number of latent and basal noncount shoots (Table 1; Figure 1). Less shoot thinning is required when practicing cane relative to spur pruning. This is of particular importance if the availability of vineyard labor is more limited in the springtime than during the dormant period. Unwanted increases in shoot density can be further compounded if vines are pruned to excessive count bud numbers (greater than three to five per linear foot ofcordon) when aiming to offset the threat of cold injury or spring frost. If neither cold injury nor frost damage occurs, shoot numbers will be too excessive for desirable canopy and crop health. Shoot thinning is highly important to achieve recommended shoot densities in this situation.
Table 1. The effects of training and pruning on shoot numbers.
Total shoot count
Total shoot count
Count shoot percent
(of total shoot number/vine)**
|Cordon training and spur pruning||45||47||56|
|Head training and cane pruning||22||27||71|
*Hatch (2015); data averaged across 2013 and 2014 seasons in ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’. **White and Hickey (2018); data averaged across 2017 and 2018 seasons in ‘Petit Manseng’.
It is important to thin shoots because excessive shoot density will increase the incidence of cluster touching and bunch rot. Canopy and cluster congestion will increase the amount of time it takes for tissues to dry and will further limit fungicide spray penetration. We do not need help promoting fungal diseases in our humidclimate. Therefore, shoots should be thinned in the spring to optimize canopy porosity, maintain cluster health, and produce a balanced crop yield. The right photo in Figure 2 was the result of two factors: one, excessive bud number retention at pruning; and two, failure to shoot thin in the spring. The shaded parts of the several touching or overlapping clusters will be prone to bunch rot and have poor color and varietal character development (Fiola, 2017). The left photo in Figure 2 shows an optimal shoot and cluster density that allows good fungicide coverage and sunlight penetration into the fruit zone.
When to thin shoots
Shoots grow fast early in the season. This early period of rapid shoot growth often coincides with the period offrost threat. There is therefore a very short window of opportunity to efficiently shoot thin (Fiola, 2017; Smith and Centinari, 2017), which is roughly between the 3- to 12-inch growth stage (Figure 3). Ideally, this window ofopportunity occurs after the threat of frost has passed, leaving the lone decision of when to start thinning based on shoot growth. Bets must be hedged if thethreat of frost remains and labor is short (unfortunate, but often the case). Should shoot thinning start before the threat of frost has passed to increase the chances of finishing the task efficiently? Or, should shoot thinning commence after the threat of frost has passed, potentially beyond the growth stage when it is most efficiently implemented? A solution to this problem may be to start thinning as soon as fruitful vs. nonfruitful shoots can be identified (3 to 5 inches), using active frost protection (Hickey et al., 2018) to protect the retained shoots.
Fruitful shoots are valuable. However, theymay be accidentally thinned if shoot thinning is conducted beforeclusters are visible. On the other hand, if shootthinning is conducted too late, shoot tendrils will become attached to neighboring shoots and lignification will begin at the base of the shoot, precluding efficient shoot thinning. Hybrid cultivars tend to have more fruitful secondary shoots than vinifera cultivars. This “crop insurance” might serve as an impetus to thin hybrids first, particularly in vineyards subject to frequent late-spring frosts that kill primary shoots. On the other hand, it would be logical to shoot thin early bud-breaking cultivars (e.g., ‘Chardonnay’, ‘Merlot’, ‘Blanc du Bois’, ‘Lomanto’) before late-breaking cultivars (e.g., ‘Petit Verdot’, ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’, ‘Chambourcin’,‘Traminette’) due to shoot growth differences on a given calendar date.
How to thin shoots
Basal, diseased, unfruitful, and otherwise short or malformed shoots are good candidates for thinning. Fruitful shoots that emerge from count bud positions on the spur should be retained (Figure 4). Saving basal or unfruitful shoots is advised when a spur renewal is needed to improve productivity on a region of the cordon. If implementedwithin the above-recommended window of shoot growth (3 to 12 inches), shoots can be easily snapped off by hand. A pair of hand shears will help to separate shoots by cutting tendrils if shoots are thinned much after they are 16 to 20 inches in height. Hand shears will also be necessary if shoots start to become lignified at the junction of the shoot and 1-year-old spur, which begins to occur when a shoot reaches a height of roughly 24 inches. Hand shears may also be necessary to thin shoots if excessive bud numbers were retained on spurs to compensate for potential frost or cold injury(Figure 4). It is advised to first cut shoots away from the apical (top) portion of the spur to maintain lower renewal positions for next year. Mechanical, tractor-mounted shoot thinning equipment is primarily used in large-acreage wine and juice grape production systems.
In the above text, the rather subjective terms “optimal” and “excessive” have been used to describe shoot density. Shoot density should be adjusted to roughly three to five shoots per linear foot of cordon or cane (Fiola, 2017; Smith and Centinari, 2017; Figure 5). On a per-vine basis, those densities equate to roughly 15 to 25 shoots if between-vine spacing is 5 feet, and 18 to 30 shoots if between- vine spacing is 6 feet. For a table of target bud densities per vine in popular training systems and vine spacings, see UGA Extension Bulletin 1505, “Dormant Spur and Cane Pruning Bunch Grapevines.” Assuming that there are no incurred losses to pests, crop yield would be roughly 3.8 tons per acre if: rows were spaced 9 feet apart, four shoots per linear foot of cordon were retained on a single-cordon training system, the average cluster weight was 120 grams, and average shoot fruitfulness was 1.5 clusters per shoot. Crop yield would be roughly 4.8 tons per acre using the previous example but increasing shoot density to five shoots per linear foot of cordon. Those examples show how much shoot density can affect crop yield. However, as stated above, being too greedy with high shoot densities can increase fungal disease prevalence and reduce wine quality potential. Higher shootdensities can be retained in hybrids relative to vinifera cultivars and in cultivars that are generally rot tolerant (‘Petit Verdot’, ‘Petit Manseng’, ‘Villard blanc’) compared to those that are not (‘Chardonnay’, ‘Sauvignon blanc’, ‘Vignoles’, ‘Blanc du Bois’).
An excessive crop may fail to reach commercial maturity in a timely manner when an increase in shoot number does not equate to an increase in exposed leaf area. Note that the crop can increase with shoot number, but high shoot density does not necessarily equate to greater light interception in the ubiquitous vertical-shoot-positioned (VSP) system (Figure 6). The “ceiling” for light interception in the VSP system is a function of foliar self- shading that occurs as a result of the space limitations of 6- to 8-inch-spaced catch wires. On the other hand, greater shoot numbers can increase both crop and light interception in training systems that have one fruit zone and a divided canopy (Figure 6). The increased space in the fruit zone and canopy in such systems may permit the retention of greater shoot densities while maintaining crop health and quality. Thus, greater shoot densities may be retained in divided, single-cordon training systems (e.g., Watson, Ballerina, “Y”, or “split” VSP trellis, and Smart-Dyson) relative to nondivided systems (e.g., VSP; single high wire). The UGA Extension Viticulture Team is currently evaluating the effect of various shoot densities and pruning methods on crop quantity and quality in both divided and nondivided VSP canopies.
Shoot thinning should not be thought of as an optional practice in wine grape vineyards. Relatively less shoot thinning will be required when the retained bud number during dormant pruning matches that of the desired shoot number, and when cane pruning is chosen over spur pruning. Shoot thinning is perhaps the most time -sensitive of all canopy management practices. There is a very short window of opportunity to thin shoots before there is an exponential increase in the labor required to complete this task. It is therefore highly advised thatshoot thinning be started in a timely fashion and as soon as shoot fruitfulness can be determined. Starting shoot thinning as early as possible during the growing season will optimize the potential for retaining only the desired number of fruit-bearing shoots. Shoot thinning sets the stage for successful production of a healthy canopy and high-quality crop that are less prone to fungal diseases.
Status and Revision History
Published on May 02, 2019